Assembling the Audience-Citizen (Or, Should Each Person Be Responsible for Their Own Paté?)
Citizen participation is often cited as a central technique for improving governmental decision-making processes. Participation is good for the polis. When more people are involved in making decisions that affect their community, better decisions will be made. Audience participation is also often cited as a central technique for augmenting the experience of theatre through increased engagement. Participation is good for art. When more people are involved in actively influencing the performance, the work will be more impactful. If the collective gathering of an interactive theatre event mirrors a society in miniature, the audience could be a citizen. But is this a legitimate equation to make?
In her book on participatory art, Artificial Hells, Claire Bishop argues persuasively that the audience is not a citizen because the assemblage of people engaged in a performance is not a democracy. Subsequently, Bishop shifts the terrain to other characteristics that mark politically productive contexts of participation distinct from the citizen model, notably “mutual tension, recognition, and dependency [and collective negotiation]” (Bishop 279). In this paper, I take these four characteristics and apply them to the participatory audience in the “long table” scene in The Assembly: Episode 1, the most recent work by Montreal’s Porte Parole. I read one unique iteration of that performance as a theoretical document giving insight into the questions: “How is a participatory audience a citizen?” and “If the audience is a citizen, how ought we to we participate?”
Alston, Adam. 2013. “Audience Participation and Neoliberal Value: Risk, Agency and Responsibility in Immersive Theatre.” Performance Research 18 (2): 128–38.
Arnstein, Sherry R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216-24.
Bishop, Claire. 2012. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London: Verso.
Burns, Danny, Robin Hambleton, and Paul Hoggett. 1994. The Politics of Decentralisation. London: Macmillan
Harvie, Jen. 2013. Fair Play: Art, Performance and Neoliberalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan,
Ridout, Nicholas. 2006. Stage Fright, Animals, and Other Theatrical Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Schweitzer, Marlis. 2017. “The American Girl Comes to Canada.” In Performance Studies in Canada, edited by Laura Levin and Marlis
Schweitzer, 137-60. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s UP.
Stephenson, Jenn. 2018. “Audience as Citizen? (Part 1).” Upsurges of the Real: A Performance Research Blog, realtheatre.blog, (20 September).
The Assembly: Episode 1. Produced by Porte Parole. Playwrights: Alex Ivanovici, Annabel Soutar and Brett Watson. Director: Chris Abraham. Set designer: Simon Guilbault. Lighting designer: Luc Prairie. Sound designer: Antoine Bédard. Performers: Jimmy Blais, Sean Colby, Alex Ivanovici, Tanja Jacobs, Ngozi Paul, and Brett Watson. Théâtre ESPACE GO. .November 2018.
Weaver, Lois. “Long Table.” Split Britches, split-britches.com
Zaiontz, Keren. 2014. “Narcissistic Spectatorship in Immersive and One-on-One Performance.” Theatre Journal 66 (3): 405–25.
Copyright (c) 2019 Jenn Stephenson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
Manuscripts submitted to Performance Matters should be original works that have not been published elsewhere. Note that authors are responsible for obtaining permission to include copyrighted material in any article or review published in Performance Matters.