Cognitive Accessibility, Ethics, and Rights in Research
Abstract
This paper is about doing research with artists with learning disabilities and autism. Artists with learning disabilities or autism need to say yes to doing research. Researchers need to explain what will happen in the research. Often, researchers think that people with learning disabilities and autism can’t say yes to being part of research. This means researchers don’t study things that are important to people with learning disabilities and autism. So, people with learning disabilities and autism don’t get a voice. All the people who wrote this work on I’m Me. I’m Me was a research project that works with seven learning disability arts companies in the United Kingdom. We used drama, dance, music and art to understand identity, representation, and voice. This paper explores our approach to ethics on the project. We wanted to avoid what we describe as a “deficit model” of ethics. Instead we worked with learning disabled artists and researchers to develop a set of rights in research. How these rights were communicated was very important in order to ensure access and understanding. I’m Me used a range of methods, including illustrations, workshops, videos, and movement. As a result of this approach, we found artists started independently talking about their rights in research.
Plain text abstract (adapted by Kelsie Acton with Daniel Foulds)
This paper is about doing research with artists with learning disabilities and autism. Artists with learning disabilities or autism need to say yes to doing research. So researchers need to explain what will happen in the research. Often, researchers think that people with learning disabilities and autism can’t say yes to being part of research. This means researchers don’t study things that are important to people with learning disabilities and autism. So, people with learning disabilities and autism don’t get a voice.
All the people who wrote this work on I’m Me. I’m Me was a research project that works with seven learning disability arts companies in the United Kingdom. We used drama, dance, music and art to understand identity, representation, and voice.
We wanted to make sure the artists could decide if they wanted to be a part of the research. To do this we
- assumed that people with learning disabilities and autism can be a part of research,
- assumed that people with learning disabilities and autism have rights in research,
- and did not assume that people with learning disabilities and autism need to be protected.
Practically, we used
- plain language,
- pictures,
We found:
- Making sure artists knew their rights took time. We needed to talk about artists’ rights several times. But artists understood their rights better when they talked about them more.
- Giving artists credit for their work is important. But making sure that people reading research don’t know who the research is about is also important. We found it hard to explain when artists’ names would and wouldn’t be used.
- We needed to experiment to find the best way.
Learning how to give people with learning disabilities and autism the information they need to decide if they want to be part of research is important.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Matthew Reason, Kelsie Acton, Daniel Foulds

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
Manuscripts submitted to Performance Matters should be original works that have not been published elsewhere. Note that authors are responsible for obtaining permission to include copyrighted material in any article or review published in Performance Matters.